close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100107040358/http://www.samefacts.com:80/category/crime-control/

Archive for the ‘Crime Control’ Category

January 4th, 2010

At age 19, boys whose mothers received nurse home visits as part of a randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership program were no less criminally active than boys in the control group. Since crime is overwhelmingly a male phenomenon, the finding in the same study that NFP greatly reduced criminality among girls (4% [...]

January 2nd, 2010

The judge had no choice; the prosecutors screwed up big-time. But there’s still a chance to make a criminal case for false statements and obstruction of justice.

December 7th, 2009

…actually Mark is getting plenty of props in his own country too, but When Brute Force Fails is a Book of the Year in The Economist’s annual list of easy-to-wrap presents for smart friends.   The rest of the RBC is happily basking in his reflected glory: you should just click on the first link, and [...]

November 23rd, 2009

How could a “fiscal conservative” approve of spending $200,000 of public money to punish a $500 drug transaction?

November 22nd, 2009

Two men rob a store with pistols. Each shoots someone. One of the victims dies. The robber who actually killed someone gets life; his partner is executed. Yes, it’s a weird outcome. But was the executed man really the victim of a miscarriage of justice? Doesn’t look that way to me.

November 13th, 2009

David Alpert proposes making parking collections more like taxes and less like a negative lottery.

October 31st, 2009

Sheriff Joe Arpaio likes to use his law enforcement powers to harass his critics. That’s a federal felony.

October 27th, 2009

The Economist has more on retribution and strategies of deterrence.

October 26th, 2009

New posts on medical marijuana at the American Constitution Society website and on crime control at the Volokh Conspiracy.

October 24th, 2009

‘Lexington” in The Economist has good things to say about HOPE and High Point. But why does he think of them as “soft”?