close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20090203025106/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/02/frank-to-call-bailed-out_n_163158.html
100 days
 
BERJAYA
BERJAYA

Bailed Out Bankers To Be Hauled Before Congress

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us mixx.com Share this on Facebook

February 2, 2009 12:33 PM

BERJAYA

Rep. Barney Frank plans to call the heads of major bailed-out banks to testify before his committee next week, two aides to the House Financial Services Committee chairman said.

Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat, has been a vocal proponent of using federal dollars to stabilize the financial system, but has also been a harsh critic of bankers who have refused to provide Congress with information as to how the bailout funds are being used. He has also been sharply critical of the Bush administration's use of the first half of the bailout funds, charging that it failed to oversee the program properly and didn't use the funds to address the foreclosure crisis as Congress had intended.

A committee aide said that the hearing, tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, Feb. 11, is still being planned and that a full witness list has yet to be compiled. Frank has long promised to bring bank heads before his committee to call on them to explain how the funds have been used.

For Frank and other backers of the bailout, known as TARP, or the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the problem is that its purpose is to prevent a total collapse of the global financial system. Because of the way politics works, it's difficult to get credit for preventing harm rather than doing good.

"It's like wearing dark pants and pissing down your leg," Frank said before the bailout vote in October. "It gives you a warm feeling, but no one knows you did it."

Lawmakers' hope had been that the rescue package would save the financial system from collapse and also return some liquidity to the credit market. While it has (so far) prevented collapse, lending remains at low levels.

Congress recently approved dispersal of the second half of the $350 billion in TARP funds. President Barack Obama is reportedly planning to tell Congress how he intends to spend that half once the stimulus bill has passed. Obama officials have indicated that more funds may well be needed beyond the original $700 billion.

Rep. Barney Frank plans to call the heads of major bailed-out banks to testify before his committee next week, two aides to the House Financial Services Committee chairman said. Frank, a Massachusett...
Rep. Barney Frank plans to call the heads of major bailed-out banks to testify before his committee next week, two aides to the House Financial Services Committee chairman said. Frank, a Massachusett...
 
 

Comments
2027
Pending Comments
2
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (48 pages total)
- New zitlight73 See Profile I'm a Fan of zitlight73 permalink

I hope they're in leg irons. I'd like to see them bring back stocks not stocks and bonds but stocks on the public square so all the people these Wall Street Ponzi scammers hurt could at least get some satisfaction in throwing rotten fruit and vegatables at them and their puppet in congress.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 02/02/2009
- New me_again See Profile I'm a Fan of me_again permalink

Unfortunately, these guys need nanny's to watch their every move.....they are used to free spending and not being told what to do......

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 02/02/2009
- New tanbro See Profile I'm a Fan of tanbro permalink

Hey Barney spit it out, if you know what I mean.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 02/02/2009
- New Cartel See Profile I'm a Fan of Cartel permalink

HEY BLUE>>>>>>

have you ever seen this.....?

http://www.jordanmaxwell.com/articles/pictures/pictures2.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 02/02/2009
- New killpack See Profile I'm a Fan of killpack permalink

Okay, seriously. Sometimes I post a lot of bullshit, but you guys are getting a little carried away with deleting my posts sometimes.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 02/02/2009
- New HighHorse See Profile I'm a Fan of HighHorse permalink

Sure would love to see Rep.Barney Frank dressed as an 18th century American Admiral standing on the helm deck looking down the hull of his 50 cannon frigate and ordering the next republican hybrid scam artist banker keel hauled until the banking bailout money is returned. That money would showup
back in the US treasury Quick!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 02/02/2009
- New Johnjlws See Profile I'm a Fan of Johnjlws permalink

"It's like wearing dark pants and pissing down your leg," Frank said before the bailout vote in October. "It gives you a warm feeling, but no one knows you did it."

And this is the man leading this charge. Barney Frank reminds me of some of the folks in business who fly into an event, squawk around, poop on everything and fly away. The reason banks are in trouble, and I work in senior management at one of the big ones, isn't because government doesn't know "what they're doing with the money," but because we (bankers, and not all) don't and throwing more money at the thing is going to exacerbate the problem not fix it. Loan money to people who can't repay it driven only by greed and you'll get the results we have. Frank and his committee will only accomplish getting Frank more t.v. time--and who needs that?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 02/02/2009
- New dragonlady620 See Profile I'm a Fan of dragonlady620 permalink

What ARE the banks doing with OUR money? The taxpayers LOANED it to the banks-so why do banks think THEY can get a loan without any conditions? Or any accountability? And are any of the CEOs taking salary cuts? This OUR MONEY.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 02/02/2009
- New davispty5 See Profile I'm a Fan of davispty5 permalink

Excuse me, but I for one am very interested to know where this bail out money is going. WE the taxpayers, who are footing the bill, have a right to know how OUR money is being spent and what your plan for repayment is. As a banker, I'm quite sure you wouldn't dole out 350 billion dollars without some kind of business model and a plan for repayment, with interest. So, spare me your rhetoric! As far as I'm concerned, you can either open your books or close your doors.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 02/02/2009
- stardot See Profile I'm a Fan of stardot permalink

Huge numbers of people made billions off the premise that home prices would rise. It's that simple, and then the market forces manipulated home values to reflect that desire.

They played so many games with buying-selling-promising-gambling-repackaging and someone made big bucks on every transaction. The honest appraisers who tried to say "hey, things are not worth that much" were booted, and only the appraisers who played the game were kept busy.

Bottom line...the bankers got rich, the agents got rich, the brokers got rich, the homeowner overpaid, and if they didn't have a business plan of their own, they got burned.

Of course, lots of people will go back into the old "Well, they shouldn't have thought they could afford a home like that on their meager income."

Yeah, that's true up to a point. But, then if you were a prospective buyer, who suddenly got respect and the "treatment", and everyone told you you could SURELY afford this, could always refi or sell at a profit, why wouldn't you believe them?

You get your BMW-Mercedes ride to the property, they show you YOUR new house, and bury you in paperwork.

Up on the the other end the bankers resold that paper and the derivatives were off and running.

Never mind that real smart people said this was a recipe for disaster.

The bankers all had the attitude that if things got bad, they could cash out move to the islands.

Some did.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 02/02/2009
- New Turtleposer See Profile I'm a Fan of Turtleposer permalink

Well put. When my hubby and I were looking for our first home, we were constantly pressured to buy a home that was way beyond our means. The realtors & mortgage brokers only cared about their commission. We bought a townhome within our means, much to the irritation of our realtor. Now it's worth about 30k less than when we bought it.

The fact of the matter is while the buyer should beware, we're not claiming to be geniuses on how the housing market works. That's why we rely on the integrity of the mortgage broker, realtor and those who lend us money. How would us ignorant masses know whether or not these people have integrity when everyone in that business is telling us the same thing?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 02/02/2009
- Mildmannered See Profile I'm a Fan of Mildmannered permalink

Maybe we should start over with brand-new banks -- either private, public or some combination -- and let the existing banks die on the vine???

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 02/02/2009
- eees42 See Profile I'm a Fan of eees42 permalink

You go Barney, no one seems to ask the hard questions and then demand answers. I would take the money back. Let our financial institutions sink or swim on their own.
80% of the stimulus should go as cash payments to those Americans with no or low discretional spending. The money would be spent on basics, depleting company inventories . Companies would then call back the laid off workers to meet the new demand.
Banks would be forced to supply the demands of growth like loans to growing bussineses. This is real investment, not the esoteric investments our financial community used to destroy our economy.
All I hear is talk,talk,talk. Stop it . Lets look at the problem and resolve it. No more politics, finger pointing or philisophical discussions. They are getting us no where.
Does anyone understand what I am saying?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 02/02/2009
- New Turtleposer See Profile I'm a Fan of Turtleposer permalink

Yep. Freeze the assets of the banks and kick out the officers. It's our money, we want it back.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 PM on 02/02/2009
- carolinecantoo See Profile I'm a Fan of carolinecantoo permalink

I get it and it makes to much sense.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 02/02/2009
- TheAndrew See Profile I'm a Fan of TheAndrew permalink

First American's are swindled out of 350 Billion this fall to apparently save failing banks. Now 18 Billion of that money has turned up in the pockets of bank executives.
Take all of the 350 back and start over. Take it back no matter where it is. Use your executive powers, emergency powers or whatever it takes but don't let the banks get away with this.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 02/02/2009
- iameliot See Profile I'm a Fan of iameliot permalink

Barney - ask the bankers from Bank of America why they jacked up the rates on millions of credit card holders with performing accounts to outrageous rates of 19-29%.!! Ask why if you call to complain about this, Bank of America cuts your credit limit to damage your FICO score or finds yet another bogus excuse to raise your rates more. You can read all the horror stories on consumer affairs complaints websites about B of A, Chase, and Citi. At a time when these banks have come hat in hand to take billions of TARP bailout money and the fed funds rate at which banks borrow is down to 0%, it is unconscionable for them to lend out to ANYONE at these rates.

Imagine what a stimulus it would be to the economy if rates by these banks lowered rates to 4% immediately on all existing credit card lines and loans.


Barney, we need a federal usury law capping rates on all consumer credit loans and lines to 10%.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 02/02/2009
- elcojonu See Profile I'm a Fan of elcojonu permalink

OK, they're hauled in front of Congress; then what ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 02/02/2009
- teacake See Profile I'm a Fan of teacake permalink

Then they go home and watch Bay Watch re-run. That's what all those useless politicians do with our money. They waste it, every day of their mis.erable life.

Congress itself is a f at cat and a waste of our money. Those politicians only serve the top 1% of the American capitalist pyramid - not us, ordinary Americans. Democracy has never really existed in American - it's just all an illusion.

The lobbyist system proves it. Only the rich have their voice heard and their demands met. We, the ordinary people will forever be treated like a doormat. We break our back to feed them through our taxes, then they turn around and give our children's savings to their friends. And they call it "bail-out" money.

I have no faith in congress any more. It's all for show. They "haul" those robbers and thieves before them, then what??? If they were serious, they would had been more strict on the bailed-out money is used BEFORE handing it over to those thieves in the banking industry.

I am sure how those greedy bankers spend their stolen money in h e l l.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 02/02/2009
- New BlueStateMan See Profile I'm a Fan of BlueStateMan permalink

So... what's YOUR solution.. other than giving UP?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 02/02/2009
- killpack See Profile I'm a Fan of killpack permalink

You're damn right! Congress steals WAY more money than any one bank or corporation.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 02/02/2009
- killpack See Profile I'm a Fan of killpack permalink

Nothing. These guys are all on the same team. Congress is going to grill the banks with a big wink and a double blink while the camera pans away. Then they'll all go out and party when the cameras stop rolling.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 02/02/2009
- Paul Peete - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Paul Peete permalink

That requires forethought, what was missing when they sunk the economy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 02/02/2009
- elcojonu See Profile I'm a Fan of elcojonu permalink

I'm beginning to suspect that we lack the necessary cast of characters in our National Legislature to ' Right the Boat '.
These folks are acting in a disoriented, unfocused manner; more interested in process than in logical solutions.
Some Banks are insolvent, close them. Don't send good money after bad investments.
I hope Barack gets a hold of this problem quick and doesn't let go.
These folks are going to have to be pushed HARD into action.
Right now the U.S. Congress is acting like a bunch of incompetent neophites; like someone once said ' I need Generals and all I got is foot soldiers ' (no disrespect to foot soldiers, I used to be one).

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 02/02/2009
- Paul Peete - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Paul Peete permalink

*sank I just feel sunk!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 02/02/2009
- harveyr2 See Profile I'm a Fan of harveyr2 permalink

How about hauling Barney Franks in front of Congress to explain why he thought it appropriate to "roll the dice some more" and for obstructing the reform of Fannie and Freddie before the "sh*t hit the fan."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 02/02/2009
- BlueStateMan See Profile I'm a Fan of BlueStateMan permalink

How about coming up with something other than your dittohead BULL$#!T?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 02/02/2009
- killpack See Profile I'm a Fan of killpack permalink

Okay, I've got one. How about haul ALL of Congress before some kind of body (as long as it has nothing to do with Congress. I mean they can call BS on other people but no one can call BS on them?) for taking money from hard working Americans who struggle to pay their bills and giving it to these banks so they can all go out and party?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 02/02/2009
- GingerB See Profile I'm a Fan of GingerB permalink

Frank, not Franks.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 PM on 02/02/2009
- New trudem2 See Profile I'm a Fan of trudem2 permalink


Whot-evah! You know who we mean. The s or no s don't make a d.a.m.n. bit of difference.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 02/02/2009
- mohawk79 See Profile I'm a Fan of mohawk79 permalink

HMM...and what she would do with all the people who thought they could buy a house with no money down.

Then used Acorn to sue the real estate company to get them into the house..

What do you think about that LIBS?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 02/02/2009
- ChrisFL See Profile I'm a Fan of ChrisFL permalink

So who has a fiduciary responsibility, the bank to it's share holders or the borrower? Why the bank of course numskull, so if they loan money with a low likelihood of repayment they are at fault. But the banks did not care because they repackaged the loan as a security and sold it elsewhere around the world which only then provided more money to loan out again because of course that is how banks make money, (you still with me) so once you loan money to all the credit worthy people you have to begin to lower your standards to continue making loans, what does all this easily available credit do to the main market for loans? (houses) why of course it makes the price rise because now there are a greater number of buyers. But if we can continue to have rising house prices it does not really matter because people can either re-finance their loans or sell the property to cover their obligation. What they in effect created was nothing but a huge futures market for housing prices. The whole thing could only continue so long as prices rose. But if median incomes were not rising how could the median house price go up? in the end it is the median income which pays for that median house right? That is why someone like me a college dropout with two economic classes under my belt more accurately predicted the housing meltdown than Alan Greenspan.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 PM on 02/02/2009
- BlueStateMan See Profile I'm a Fan of BlueStateMan permalink

I think you should call Rush up & report to him that you've failed MISERABLY.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 02/02/2009
- kdublya See Profile I'm a Fan of kdublya permalink

Yes Pecan!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 02/02/2009
- GingerB See Profile I'm a Fan of GingerB permalink

Name one.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 02/02/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (48 pages total)

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or 

 
 

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPolitics Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More


Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More
Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C. Previously he has worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Jason Linkins is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, covering media and politics. He's based in Washington, DC. Previously, he wrote for HuffPo's Eat The Press, and has also contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More

Rachel Weiner is Associate Politics Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More

Katharine Zaleski is News Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More