close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20090129015327/http://cronespeaks.wordpress.com:80/

Finally, Kristol’s Last Op Ed Piece for the NYTimes, and Typical for Kristol, it is Incoherent

You gotta read it to believe it.

Since Ronald Reagan’s election in 1980, conservatives of various sorts, and conservatisms of various stripes, have generally been in the ascendancy. And a good thing, too! Conservatives have been right more often than not — and more often than liberals — about most of the important issues of the day: about Communism and jihadism, crime and welfare, education and the family. Conservative policies have on the whole worked — insofar as any set of policies can be said to “work” in the real world. Conservatives of the Reagan-Bush-Gingrich-Bush years have a fair amount to be proud of.

To bad reality doesn’t share Kristol’s point of view.

As Attaturk notes, the only intelligent part of the column wasn’t even written by Kristol.

Vatican Arrogance

So, a Vatican official believe Obama is being “arrogant” for lifting the Global Gag Rule.

One Vatican official warned against the “arrogance” of those in power who think they can decide between life and death.

Yet, the Vatican doesn’t see their own arrogance of supporting the GGR that has killed hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children that could no longer get health care when clinics closed or severely curtailed their services because of the lack of funds.

Perhaps the Vatican should practice what they preach. Their arrogant support of the GGR, and opposition of abortion has resulted in many deaths.

The Good the Bad and the Ugly From the First Week of a New Leadership

So, Tuesday was a whirlwind day for many, even though there were plenty that couldn’t get into the Inaguration when they had tickets. And even though Chief Justice Roberts flubbed the oath (although some think it was Obama that jumped in too soon, forget that when the swearer pauses, that’s a sign for the swearee to start repeating), and had to readminister it.

There was a glaring difference between the invocation and benediction that some of the “big boy” liberal bloggers (come on, David, fine for it’s context?) missed. The dude left out more than half the population focusing on male supremacy. While the righties are whinning (as David does predict will happen) about Lowrey’s benediction, I will leave you with the thought that it was passionate, inclusive (not just by race, but by gender), firey, and it should be a conversation starter for the racial, class, and gender differences still experienced in our country, and which has gotten significantly worse the last 8 years.

Now, shortly after the November election, I noted that the republican’s left in congress were overwhelmingly on the extremist right, and would do everything in their power to thwart democrats. It appears that so far I was correct, when repugs opposed Geithner, Cornyn blocked (for a short time) Hilary Clinton, delaying the Holder confirmation (granted I have my own problems with Holder).

The rabid right won’t stop whinning any time soon. These folks hate equality, tolerance, and intellectualism so much that they are voicing their hope that the Obama administration fails. The people that survive on a message of fear are continuing to drive that fear message home to those that don’t have the brains to think things through. Obama’s “I won, get over it” attitude towards the regressive repugs is a tough one, we must remember it is the same attitude regressive repugs used 4 and 8 years ago. With one exception — Obama LISTENED before making his statement of fact.

Regardless of the slightly rocky start, which any cynic would have expected, Obama got down to work immediately. We have a halt to the kangaroo kourt Gitmo proceedings, and an Order closing Gitmo as soon as practically possible, within a year. Of course, with the righties dependency on fear, their fear of possible “indoctrination” by erroneously termed enemy combatants of other criminals is to be expected.

I am cautiously optimistic of the pay freeze for WhiteHouse aides. I feel that this signals a beginning to an end of government worker excess on taxpayer’s dime.

Many have accepted the call to serve in Government and to assist me in restoring a sound economy and in improving the lives of average Americans. In this challenging economic period, it is only appropriate that senior officials on the White House staff forgo pay increases until further notice.
Accordingly, as a signal of our shared commitment to restoring the country’s economic vitality and because of the serious economic conditions we are facing, I intend to freeze the salaries of senior members of the White House staff, to the extent permitted by law. I direct you to report back to me within 30 days with recommendations for actions to implement this freeze.

For all the repugs that spew the mantra of an end to government excess, they never truly ended government pay excesses. Unfortunately, I don’t think a pay freeze will last much longer past the current recession.

Once extremist rightie Rush voiced his “concern” that a more open FOIA rule would allow an easier road to hold the Bush administration accountable for the lies, deception, and illegal acts, I allowed myself to feel a little more optimism. Holding Bush accountable should be more of a priority when we take a look at how Bush’s NSA spied on EVERYBODY. Let’s not forget that Bush told us it wasn’t everybody, and that can be quantified as a lie to the American people.

While there are a number of other issues I’d like to discuss, the end of the week Memorandum repealing the Global Gag Rule, overshadowed everything else for me. While I was dismayed that Obama took several days to get to this, I can’t tell you how thrilled I was. However, I think that Sen. Boxer should revive her amendment that would end the partisan flip-flopping of feast or famine of aid to NGO’s providing family planning overseas. While the global Gag Rule is a heinous piece of women-hating vitriol, I would be remiss if I did not remind you that Bush expanded the Global Gag Rule. During the last 8 years, maternal mortality rose, infant mortality rose, clinics closed (some of which were the only available clinics to many women and children).

When President Bush reinforced the ban, the organisation lost about $2m in funding overnight. More than 1,000 outreach workers lost their jobs and, it estimates, about 38,000 women lost contraceptive, post-natal and immunisation services.

Basically, the regressive woman and child hating Global Gag rule put women and children in danger and led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of women and children during the last 8 years. There is no morality associated with backing the GGR. But, this is only one step in acknowledging women need healthy pregnancies (including deciding when to be pregnant) to live healthy lives.

Krugman Speaks

Will Obama listen?

But my real problem with the speech, on matters economic, was its conventionality. In response to an unprecedented economic crisis — or, more accurately, a crisis whose only real precedent is the Great Depression — Mr. Obama did what people in Washington do when they want to sound serious: he spoke, more or less in the abstract, of the need to make hard choices and stand up to special interests.

That’s not enough. In fact, it’s not even right.

Thus, in his speech Mr. Obama attributed the economic crisis in part to “our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age” — but I have no idea what he meant. This is, first and foremost, a crisis brought on by a runaway financial industry. And if we failed to rein in that industry, it wasn’t because Americans “collectively” refused to make hard choices; the American public had no idea what was going on, and the people who did know what was going on mostly thought deregulation was a great idea.

Here we are stuck in the middle …

As the Nation Moves Forward, Tennessee Moves Backwards

Back in November, the nation moved forward, rejecting, soundly, the regressive/republican guard. Except Tennessee, which got redder, the General Assembly now being controlled by regressives for the first time since reconstruction. While Obama was speaking of moving forward, dealing with the failing economy, and “worn-out dogmas,” Tennessee regressives were putting wedge issues of abortion and guns to the forefront.

New Tennessee House Speaker Kent Williams has indicated that abortion restrictions and gun rights issues will be at the top of his agenda this legislative session.

The Elizabethton Republican was the surprise winner of the chamber’s top post last week when he was joined by all 49 Democrats to beat House Republican Leader Jason Mumpower of Bristol by one vote.

He immediately announced he wanted to quickly pass a long-stalled measure to restrict access to abortions and to expand the areas where people with handgun permits can carry weapons.

Forget declining ability to afford health care coverage, the climbing unemployment rate, the declining state of our children’s education, in this state, the increasing number of folks that need aid to feed their families, among other issues that are greatly effecting Tennessean’s on a daily basis. Nosireebob. The most important issues are further restricting abortion — SJR127?– (which will lead to more mouths that cannot be fed or properly educated, not to mention putting women’s lives at risk),  and putting Tennessee squarely into 18th century wild, wild west. This is what the dems in TN voted for, as Speaker of the House.

Ironically, just two days ago, Williams stated he wanted to end partisan bickering.

Typical republican regressiveness is going to be hip-deep real fast here. Progressives, please send shovels!

Banks Need to Give Back Taxpayer Monies

As far as I’m concerned, the banks need to return the bailout money to taxpayers, immediately.

At the Palm Beach Ritz-Carlton last November, John C. Hope III, the chairman of Whitney National Bank in New Orleans, stood before a ballroom full of Wall Street analysts and explained how his bank intended to use its $300 million in federal bailout money.

Make more loans?” Mr. Hope said. “We’re not going to change our business model or our credit policies to accommodate the needs of the public sector as they see it to have us make more loans.

Hoard taxpayer dollars which was, for all intents and purposes, supposed to loosen the credit crunch, and which we are finding never happened. Nope, this quote from one banker, while quantified as a “small sampling,” seems to be the standard for banks that got a piecce of each of us, as we see with this local bank that was not highlighted by the NYTimes piece. Note that the “long-term shift in strategy” for First Horizon is limiting loans and “socking away” money into reserves. By the way, don’t forget to also note that much of their losses (loans that are unpaid) were written off. Shorter version: First Horizon “socked away” much of their $866M bailout piece.

This is why I argued that the bailout money needed to go to the people and small businesses that are drowing in the trickle-down scheme brought to us by Reagan and continued to be pushed on us by Reaganites. It doesn’t/didn’t work. And another thing that hasn’t worked is deregulation and free-markets. It failed under the Articles of Confederacy and it’s failed again. Have we not learned from history????

As a final note, particularly to Obama and the incoming administration, here is a plan to jump-start our economy, that wont cost a penny.

Is There Even A Defense for Teleco Immunity?

According to Holder, PE Obama’s administration will defend  teleco immunity.

The incoming Obama administration will vigorously defend congressional legislation immunizing U.S. telecommunication companies from lawsuits about their participation in the Bush administration’s domestic spy program.

That was the assessment Thursday by Eric Holder, President-elect Barack Obama’s choice for attorney general, who made the statement during his confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee

Executive branch corporate whoredom continues. Where is the change?

Dr. Sanjay Gupta for Surgeon General? Please Say No

I’m speaking for myself only, but I have to say that even considering Dr. Gupta for the position of Surgeon General has got to be one of the most irresponsible decisions coming from Obama.

The Obama transition team approached Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent, about becoming U.S. surgeon general, according to sources inside the transition and at CNN.

Some of the outrage or just sheer disappointment on the left is aimed at Gupta’s irresponsible and false reporting on (including a debate) on Michael Moore’s Sicko.

But, I have to say that there have been other statements by Gupta on breast cancer “prevention” (just one example) that has set me to screaming at his face on the TV, and ultimately has led me to discount his objectivity as a doctor. He is nothing more than a tool for the pharmaceutical and medical device industry, in my opinion. I won’t watch him anymore.

It is because of his open disregard to the full mammography/breast cancer debate (that is quite old and ongoing) that should be at the top of the list to completely negate his ability to be this nation’s Surgeon General. Between this and his false statements on Sicko, he has shown that he is not responsible or accountable for his words, and should not be directing the health of our nation.

Bring Humanism Back to Israel/Palestinian Conflict

As you may have noticed, I have been on hiatus, mostly because I have overloaded on outrage fatigue and simply just needed a break. The Gaza situation, though, has been weighing heavily on my mind, a little more than it usually would, because I know a woman that lives near the Gaza border.

While she is a wonderful, very creative lady, whom I have a lot of respect for, policitcs was interjected into the craft list we both participate in. I can’t imagine living where bombs are constantly dropping near where you live. Nearly word for word, her sentiments were echoed here.

Mechi’s husband David:

Whenever human life is taken, it’s tragic, but when we’re talking about murderers who are trying to kill us, it’s a big relief.

On the other hand we’re convinced that the innocent people who were killed, this is totally the fault of Hamas who use them as human shields.

We believe all life is sacred, so the Hamas regime is at fault.

Now, this lady I know, bemoaned the media and world reactions, saying something like the world sides with the Palastinians when Israel bombs Gaza, because the terrorists hide behind civilians. The disproportionate reaction by Israel has become a huge concern,which leads people looking from the outside in, to be more supportive of the Palestinian people.

Israel and Hamas both must respect the prohibition under the laws of war against deliberate and indiscriminate attacks on civilians, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch expressed grave concern about Israeli bombings in Gaza that caused civilian deaths and Palestinian rocket attacks on Israeli civilian areas in violation of international law.

Rocket attacks on Israeli towns by Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups that do not discriminate between civilians and military targets violate the laws of war, while a rising number of the hundreds of Israeli bombings in Gaza since December 27, 2008, appear to be unlawful attacks causing civilian casualties. Additionally, Israel’s severe limitations on the movement of non-military goods and people into and out of Gaza, including fuel and medical supplies, constitutes collective punishment, also in violation of the laws of war.

Some would say that Israel’s heavy foot on Gaza has caused, in part, the Palestinian people supporting Hamas in elections.  And, isn’t it interesting that you don’t hear about the Bush involvement in the Palestinian elections, which lead to Hamas’ winning 56% in democratically held elections?  Also, let’s not forget when Israel pulled out of Gaza, they retained control of the land, air, sea, border crossings, water, sewage, electricity, and communications in Gaza, but no one I have read from Israel or Israeli supporters recognizes this. In fact, and very unbelievingly, this woman I know has the audacity to tell her world-wide friends that the Palestinians are “free.” If living like the Palestinians have been living is freedom, thanks but no thanks.  The Gazans have no hope, nearly 80% of the people depend on humanitarian aid just to eat one meal a day. Abject poverty leads to desperation, desperation leads to an uprising against one’s oppressors. Basic human response that we have seen time and time again, throughout history.

But, it was part of Starhawk’s essay that really explained to me the reaction of this lady on the craft list.

I don’t get how my own people can be doing this. Or rather, I do get it. I am a Jew, by birth and upbringing, born six years after the Holocaust ended, raised on the myth and hope of Israel. The myth goes like this:

“For two thousand years we wandered in exile, homeless and
persecuted, nearly destroyed utterly by the Nazis. But out of that
suffering was born one good thing-the homeland that we have come back
to, our own land at last, where we can be safe, and proud, and
strong.”

That’s a powerful story, a moving story. There’s only one problem with it-it leaves the Palestinians out. It has to leave them out, for if we were to admit that the homeland belonged to another people, well, that spoils the story.

The result is a kind of psychic blind spot where the Palestinians are concerned. If you are truly invested in Israel as the Jewish homeland, the Jewish state, then you can’t let the Palestinians be real to you. It’s like you can’t really focus on them. Golda Meir said, “The Palestinians, who are they? They don’t exist.” We hear, “There is no partner for peace,” “There is no one to talk to.”

And so Israel, a modern state with high standards of hygiene, a state rooted in a religion that requires washing your hands before you eat and regular, ritual baths, builds settlements that don’t bother to construct sewage treatment plants. They just dump raw sewage onto the Palestinian fields across the fence, somewhat like a spaceship ejecting its wastes into the void. I am truly not making this up-I’ve seen it, smelled it, and it’s a known though shameful fact. But if the Palestinians aren’t really real-who are they? They don’t exist!-then the land they inhabit becomes a kind of void in the psyche, and it isn’t really real, either. At times, in those border villages, walking the fencelines of settlements, you feel like you have slipped into a science fiction movie, where parallel universes exist in the same space, but in different strands of reality, that never touch.

Some very powerful imaging here, and yes, a lot of truth. I have yet to read this my friend call the Palestinian people, people. She has not ever, to my knowledge, referred to Gazans as human beings, the closest term, and a very sanatized term, is civilians.  These are not people that have families. The Palestinian children are not recognized as also living in fear.

This woman has bemoaned the fact that more and more people are supporting the Paelstinians and are against Israel because the news biasly reports the disproportinate response by Israel. Yes, the victimization card. I must note, that for Israel to place the victim card, they MUST leave out the humanization of the Palestinian people, as well as their part in creating severe oppression.

Someplace along the way, humanization must be brought back to the equation in order for peace to succeed. But, I don’t expect that any time soon. I heard not too long ago a quote, and I cannot remember where I heard it/read it. But, it went something like this:

Societies are not set up for peace. They are set up for war.

In order to change that, people must become human again.

Madoff’s “Giant Ponzi Scheme” Get’s Him Arrested

This is what happens when there is deregulation on Wall Street.

The former chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market is best known as the founder of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, the closely-held market-making firm he launched in 1960. But he also ran a hedge fund that U.S. prosecutors said racked up $50 billion of fraudulent losses.

Madoff told senior employees of his firm on Wednesday that “it’s all just one big lie” and that it was “basically, a giant Ponzi scheme,” with estimated investor losses of about $50 billion, according to the U.S. Attorney’s criminal complaint against him.

It’s amazing that folks still cannot pick out a ponzi scheme, but I would say that boils down to simple greed. Yet, it is the greediness of the person, in this case Madoff, that starts the ponzi scheme in the first place which hurts those beneath him the most. Yet, if convicted, the “sentence” would be minimal compared to the $50B he’s stolen:

U.S. prosecutors charged Madoff, 70, with a single count of securities fraud. They said he faces up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $5 million.

There is at least one question that is bugging me on this — why has it taken so long for the US Attorney’s to file a criminal complaint against Madoff.

Madoff has been conducting a Ponzi scheme since at least 2005, the U.S. said. Around the first week of December, Madoff told a senior employee that hedge fund clients had requested about $7 billion of their money back, and that he was struggling to pay them.

BERJAYA