close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar 26;20(1):89.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01079-6.

Gingivitis efficacy of a 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride dentifrice: a 24-week randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Gingivitis efficacy of a 0.454% w/w stannous fluoride dentifrice: a 24-week randomized controlled trial

C R Parkinson et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Plaque-induced gingivitis can be prevented and treated with regular effective oral hygiene, principally via mechanical cleaning with regular toothbrushing. To complement the mechanical plaque removal, antimicrobial ingredients can be incorporated into dentifrices to inhibit the growth of plaque. This study aimed to evaluate and compare gingivitis and the proportion of subjects moving between gingivitis severity (< 10, > 10 < 30, > 30% bleeding sites), and plaque reduction, following twice daily use of an experimental non-aqueous 0.454% weight/weight (w/w) stannous fluoride (SnF2) dentifrice, compared to a negative control dentifrice over 12 and 24 weeks.

Method: This was a single-center, examiner-blinded, randomized, stratified, two-treatment arm, parallel group, 24-week clinical study in healthy adult volunteers with moderate gingivitis. At baseline, after abstaining from toothbrushing overnight, subjects underwent MGI (modified gingival index), BI (bleeding index) and PI (plaque index) assessments. Eligible subjects, who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, were stratified based on gender and baseline mean MGI score (Low ≤2.00 /High > 2.00) and randomized to treatment. Following randomization, subjects underwent a thorough dental prophylaxis and flossing. After 12 and 24 weeks of twice daily brushing with their allocated treatment, subjects returned to the site (with overnight plaque, having abstained from oral hygiene procedures for 8 h prior to visit) for MGI, BI and PI assessments. Treatment effect was evaluated by comparing the MGI, BI and PI scores.

Results: One hundred and twenty-nine subjects were screened; 98 subjects were randomized and 90 subjects completed the study. Statistically significant differences between treatments, in favour of the 0.454% stannous fluoride dentifrice were observed, compared to the negative control dentifrice, for all outcome measures (MGI, BI, bleeding sites and PI at weeks 12 and 24 p < 0.0001). At 24 weeks, 71% of subjects in the 0.453% SnF2 treatment group demonstrated < 10% of bleeding sites.

Conclusion: A dentifrice containing 0.454% w/w SnF2 was shown to be superior to a standard dentifrice in controlling gingivitis and supra-gingival plaque, over a 24-week period. Over two thirds of subjects in the 0.454% SnF2 treatment group demonstrated a level of bleeding sites potentially representative of "clinical periodontal health" (< 10%) following a dental prophylaxis and 24 weeks of product use.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, on 11th Oct. 2019 (NCT04123665).

Keywords: Dentifrice; Gingivitis; Plaque; Stannous fluoride.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CP is an employee of GSKCH a manufacturer of one of the products in this study. This study was sponsored by GSKCH. JLM and KRM are employees of Salus Research, Inc., a contract research organization who have received funding from GSKCH.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow. (ITT, intent to treat; PP, per protocol)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
% distribution of subjects with < 10, > 10 < 30, and > 30% bleeding sites by treatment and timepoint. The percentage of bleeding sites at each timepoint was calculated as the number of sites with a bleeding score of 1 or 2, expressed as a percentage of the total number of bleeding sites assessed

References

    1. Petersen PE, Ogawa H. The global burden of periodontal disease: towards integration with chronic disease prevention and control. Periodontol 2000. 2012;60(1):15–39. - PubMed
    1. Chapple IL, Gilbert AD, Wilson NHF. Understanding Periodontal Diseases: Assessment and Diagnostic Procedures. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 2002. p. 160.
    1. Chapple IL, et al. Primary prevention of periodontitis: managing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(Suppl 16):S71–S76. - PubMed
    1. Palmier TR, Teles FR. Antimicrobial agents used in the control of periodontal biofilms: effective adjuncts to mechanical plaque control? Braz Oral Res. 2009;23(1):9. - PubMed
    1. Tinanoff N. Progress regarding the use of stannous fluoride in clinical dentistry. J Clin Dent. 1995;6(Special Issue):37–40. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data